VertiStratInsights Main website ↗

Oil & Gas Projects Under Evaluation and Design: A Segment-Wise Read of 2026 (Upstream to Petchem)

Friday, November 06, 2026

Oil & Gas Projects Under Evaluation and Design: A Segment-Wise Read of 2026 (Upstream to Petchem)

Sources: Global Energy Monitor (GEM), Wood Mackenzie, GlobalData, IEA, ADI Analytics, S&P Global, IGU. Written 6 Nov 2026.

Data caveat. GEM has not published a 2026 global pre-construction tally in the material I could reach, and S&P Global's project-level pre-FID data is paywalled. Every number below is attributed to its source and year. Where a figure is old (GEM's pipeline numbers date from 2022, its LNG numbers from early 2024), the chart says so. Read the shapes, not the decimals.

Updated 9 November 2026. The $55–60 Brent band used below is ADI Analytics’ January 2026 outlook, made before the mid-2026 Middle East supply disruption. The US EIA says Brent averaged $114 a barrel in September 2026 and its October outlook puts the 2026 average at $96 (Petroleum News, linked in sources). Segment 4 (onshore), its scorecard row and the breakevens watch item have been rewritten on current data: the Dallas Fed Energy Survey, EIA’s October outlook, Spears & Associates and Westwood, and GEM’s March 2026 extraction tracker. The offshore section’s chart band is still the January forecast.

The big picture

The pipeline is bifurcating. Capital is flowing to low-breakeven offshore and to US-centred LNG, while a very large stock of proposed gas infrastructure sits unsanctioned, and Middle East and pipeline projects face delay and stranded-asset questions. Wood Mackenzie counts 23 projects sanctioned in 2026 so far, carrying about $96bn of commitments, with up to 10 more (about $70bn) possible but described as unlikely to all land.

Upstream FIDs, 2026 (Wood Mackenzie Q3 tracker) Sanctioned YTD: 23 projects$96bn Possible by year-end: up to 10~$70bn (unlikely in full) Bar length proportional to $bn.
Source: Wood Mackenzie, Upstream Q3 2026 pre-FID tracker (summary).

Segment 1: Offshore and deepwater (FPSO-led)

This is the healthiest segment. ADI Analytics reports offshore FIDs of about $164bn, the highest in over a decade, and Wood Mackenzie notes FPSO projects dominated Q2 committed investment. The economics explain it: deepwater breakeven is roughly $40/bbl against about $65/bbl for new US shale wells, which mattered when ADI’s January 2026 outlook saw Brent at $55-60 on a 2-4.5 MMbpd surplus.

Indicative breakeven, $/bbl (ADI Analytics) Deepwater~40 New US shale wells~65 Brent forecast band $55-60 sits between the two
Source: ADI Analytics 2026 outlook.

Segment 2: LNG liquefaction

LNG is where the volume is, and also where the slowdown is. 2025 was a record: 9 projects, 72 Mtpa sanctioned (Wood Mackenzie), over 100 bcm/yr by the IEA's count. For 2026, Wood Mackenzie expects just 4-5 FIDs, and every 2026 FID so far is American (over 31 bcm/yr). Behind them sits an enormous unsanctioned stock: roughly 648 Mtpa proposed in North America alone, 170 in Russia and 133 in Africa (IGU, 2024 data). Whether even a fraction is built depends on contracting in a softer market.

LNG liquefaction, Mtpa Operating (GEM, Feb 2024)465.8 Under construction (GEM)191.3 Pre-FID: North America (IGU)648 Pre-FID: Russia (IGU)170 Pre-FID: Africa (IGU)133 Scale: 1 px = 2 Mtpa. Pre-FID is proposed, not probable.
Sources: GEM via Business Ghana (Feb 2024); IGU (2024 data). Dates differ, so do not sum.

Segment 3: Gas pipelines and import terminals

GEM's last global pipeline census (2022) found 122,500 km in pre-construction against 70,900 km being built, about $486bn of capex flagged as stranded-asset risk. The pre-construction stock was nearly 1.7 times what was physically under way. The regional picture is more concrete: GEM's Asia Gas Tracker says India has the world's third-largest buildout, with nearly three-quarters already under construction, so there the pipeline is converting to steel rather than lingering in design.

Gas pipelines, '000 km (GEM, 2022) Under construction70.9 Pre-construction122.5
Source: Global Energy Monitor, Pipe Dreams (2022). A 2022 snapshot, not current.

Segment 4: Onshore upstream and new fields

The price shock did not set off an onshore boom, and that is the story of this segment. Brent averaged about $114 a barrel in September and WTI averaged $98.70 while the Dallas Fed was surveying producers that month, yet executives said they still budget off $65–70 because the futures curve is steeply backwardated. Asked in March, firms said they needed $66 on average to drill a new well profitably ($67 in the Permian, $59 for large firms). Spot prices clear every one of those breakevens. What holds drilling back is doubt that the prices will last: the same respondents expect WTI at $88 by year-end and $79 two years out.

  • Planning price: $55–60 for 2026, assumed a year earlier (Spears & Associates); now $65–70 (Dallas Fed survey comments, September 2026).
  • New-well breakeven (WTI): about $65 for new US shale wells (ADI, January); $66 average and $67 in the Permian (Dallas Fed, March 2026).
  • US Lower 48 rigs (annual average): 561 in 2025, about 560 in 2026, 605 forecast for 2027 (Spears).
  • US crude output: 13.66 mb/d in 2025. EIA’s 2026 forecast rose from 13.51 mb/d in April to 13.87 mb/d in October; 14.30 mb/d is forecast for 2027.
  • Cash flow reinvested: about 50% across operators (Spears); about 30–32% at Diamondback.

So the response came through output, not new rigs. EIA raised its 2026 US production forecast in every monthly outlook from April to October, mostly on the Permian. Public companies held their rig counts roughly flat, and Spears says the growth came from privately held operators. Diamondback, a large Permian producer, is typical. It raised its 2026 oil guidance to about 524,000 b/d and its capital budget only from about $3.9bn to $3.95–4.0bn, and is using the extra cash for dividends, buybacks and debt. In the Dallas Fed’s third-quarter survey the E&P capital-spending index cooled from 42.7 to 35.3. Respondents cited rising finding and lease-operating costs and, for independents, tighter bank credit.

Outside the US the shock has been a disruption, not a windfall. Rig work in the Gulf has been interrupted: H&P cut its planned Saudi rig reactivations for the year from seven to five. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which each have more than 1 mb/d of export routes that avoid Hormuz, have kept drilling, and ADNOC Gas sanctioned Phases 2 and 3 of its Rich Gas Development in August. Argentina’s investment regime has drawn about $60bn of proposed upstream capital and more than 3,000 well commitments. Westwood expects the world’s average onshore rig count to rise about 11% between 2026 and 2031, from 4,021 to 4,445, and India’s from 134 to 154.

New-field approvals have kept running regardless. Global Energy Monitor’s March 2026 extraction-tracker release counts at least 10 billion boe approved for development in 2025, led by volume in Kuwait, Iran, Brazil and the US, against about 8 billion boe across at least 20 fields in 2023. Russia, Norway, Nigeria, Australia and the US hold 34% of fields not yet producing. Southeast Asia remains a regional hotspot: GEM flagged a decade-high number of gas decisions for 2025.

The binding constraint onshore has moved from price to conviction. On January’s $55–60 outlook, shale at a $65 breakeven was the marginal barrel. At $90–110 spot it is comfortably in the money, but operators are budgeting as if prices will fall back to about $65–70. That is a floor about $10 higher than a year ago, and still within a few dollars of their breakevens. Onshore design work is therefore growing slowly from a higher base, not being deferred. The test is whether 2027 budgets, set in February, move their planning price up.

Segment 5: Oil pipelines

GEM's 2022 oil pipeline report had the US ahead of every other country in new capacity by length, with pre-construction projects adding about 21.8 mb/d. I found no 2026 update, so treat this segment as the least evidenced here.

Segment 6: Refining

Refining is a growth story with an expiry date. BloombergNEF projects net capacity growth of about 4.2 mb/d over 2026-2030, with retirements (mainly Europe and North America) taking roughly 0.2 mb/d out. About half of the planned additions are already operating or under construction; the 2028-2030 tranche is at earlier stages and carries more delay or cancellation risk. OPEC's regional split puts 2.8 mb/d in Asia-Pacific, 1.0 in the Middle East and 0.8 in Africa. An earlier IEA outlook called this wave of growth likely to be the last. Near term, the IEA's May 2026 Oil Market Report expected 2026 refinery throughput to fall by 1.6 mb/d to 82.3 mb/d on infrastructure damage and supply disruption, a reminder that projects in design compete with a shaky operating base.

Planned refining additions to 2030, mb/d (OPEC regional split) Asia-Pacific2.8 Middle East1.0 Africa0.8
Sources: OPEC outlook via search summary; BloombergNEF (net +4.2 mb/d, retirements about -0.2). Regional split sums to 4.6 gross; it is not netted for closures.

Segment 7: LPG

LPG is the clearest case of midstream capex chasing associated-gas growth. US Gulf Coast export capacity is forecast to rise from about 60 to 100 mtpa by 2029. Projects in design or build include Enterprise's Houston Ship Channel expansion (+300 kb/d, a 36% lift to 1.135 mb/d dedicated, due late 2026), Targa's Galena Park (444 to about 625 kb/d by Q3 2027), and a new 400 kb/d Texas City terminal from Oneok and MPLX. Canada shows the risk: AltaGas's REEF terminal slipped to March 2027 with costs up 12% to about CAD 1.5bn. I found no India demand or import data this round, so the demand side is unaddressed here.

US Gulf LPG export additions, kb/d Enterprise (EHT)+300 Targa (Galena Park)+181 Oneok/MPLX (new)+400
Sources: RBN Energy, Tank Terminals and Argus via search summaries. Targa +181 is 625 minus 444. Dates range 2026-2027; dark bars are expansions, light is a new terminal.

Segment 8: Petrochemicals

This is the weakest segment on the margin. China added more than 10 Mt/y of ethylene capacity in 2024-25, Asian olefin margins have been negative for years, and some Northeast Asian crackers have shut. Even so, SunSirs counts over 13 Mt/y of world-scale cracker capacity in late construction (e.g. Huajin Aramco, Fujian Gulang), against only about 6.87 Mt/y of estimated capacity reductions (CGS International), so supply keeps outrunning demand. Mysteel expects an H1 2026 lull in new polyethylene capacity, with most arriving in H2. Evidence points to delays rather than cancellations, and CERA does not expect margins to turn positive until after 2030. The design-phase signal is that new Chinese greenfield investment slows after 2029, while integrated refinery-petchem complexes remain the preferred form in Asia and the Middle East.

Ethylene capacity, Mt/y (mixed sources, mostly China) Added 2024-25 (>10)>10 Late construction (>13)>13 Planned reductions (6.87)6.87
Sources: SunSirs, CGS International and S&P Global (APPEC) via search summaries. Different scopes and years; read as relative scale only.

Segment scorecard

SegmentPipeline stage signalDirection in 2026Evidence quality
Refining~4.2 mb/d net adds to 2030; later tranche early-stageAsia/Africa/ME growth; West closingMedium (BNEF, OPEC)
LPG exportMultiple Gulf Coast expansions to 2027; Canada slippingStrong, US-centredMedium (company and trade press)
PetrochemicalsLate-stage build still landing into oversupplyWeak margins; delaysMedium (SunSirs, S&P, Mysteel)
Offshore / FPSOHeavy sanctioningStrongMedium (ADI, WoodMac)
LNG liquefactionRecord 2025, slowdown, huge pre-FID backlogSlowing; US-centredMedium-high
Gas pipelines / terminalsPre-construction stock exceeds buildMixed; India convertingLow (2022 global, 2026 regional)
Onshore / shaleIn the money at spot; budgeted at $65-70Disciplined: output up, rigs flatMedium (Dallas Fed, EIA, Spears)
Oil pipelinesUS-dominated proposalsUnknownLow (2022)
Middle EastDelays flaggedDelayedLow-medium

What to watch

  1. LNG contracting. The 4-5 FID forecast versus 9 last year is the clearest slowdown signal.
  2. Planning price versus spot. Shale breakevens (about $66) sit far below spot, but budgets assume $65–70. If Middle East supply returns and prices fall towards that floor, anything with a breakeven near $65 is back at risk of deferral.
  3. Middle East timing. Delays shift capex into 2027.
  4. Downstream timing. Watch whether 2028-2030 refinery tranches slip, whether LPG terminals hit 2027 dates, and whether Chinese crackers start in H2 2026 as scheduled.
  5. Fresh GEM data. A new GOGET release or gas tracker update would replace the stale numbers above.

Sources: GEM gas pipelines, GEM Drilling Deeper, Business Ghana (GEM LNG), Deccan Herald, Wood Mackenzie Q3, gasworld, IEA LNG tracker, ADI Analytics, ADI 2026 upstream outlook (12 Jan 2026), Petroleum News on the EIA October 2026 STEO (Brent $114 in September; $96 forecast for 2026), Dallas Fed Energy Survey, Q3 2026 (30 Sep 2026), Dallas Fed Energy Survey, Q1 2026 (breakevens), Rigzone on EIA’s October 2026 STEO (US output), Drilling Contractor: Spears & Associates and Westwood onshore outlook (27 Oct 2026), Oilprice.com via Yahoo Finance on Diamondback Q3 2026, GEM Global Oil and Gas Extraction Tracker (March 2026 release), GlobalData, SunSirs ethylene, S&P Global APPEC olefins, RBN Energy (Enterprise LPG), refining outlook (BNEF/OPEC), S&P Global.

This post is AI-assisted analysis of public data, not investment advice. Figures are from search-result summaries of the cited sources and have not been cross-checked against the full reports.

Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan
Contact Us
Umashankar Triplicane Dwarakanathan
Investment Promotion & Energy-Sector Leader · Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
LinkedIn → GitHub → Email +91 78273 81696
How this site works

Data-led analysis of India's trade, currency and industrial policy. Every article is built from primary official sources, and every figure links back to the release, table or filing it came from.

Sources. DGCI&S TradeStat (imports/exports, HSN-wise) · PIB (government press releases, January 2017 to today, refreshed daily) · RBI (circulars, balance of payments) · MoSPI (CPI/WPI, IIP) · PARIVESH (environmental clearances) · CCIL (bond yields) · BIS (policy rates) · SEBI, NSE/BSE and SEC filings for company data.

Interpretation. Figures carry their vintage and retrieval date; estimates and press-reported numbers are labelled as such; where sources disagree, both are shown. Corrections are made visibly, never silently. Articles are written with AI assistance from the cited sources — AI-generated text can misstate figures even when working from real material, so verify any number that matters to a decision against the linked primary source.

footer

Browse all articles by topic

Every piece on this blog, grouped. Or read the full index.

Agriculture & FertilisersAI ToolsChemicalsClimate & CarbonEnergy & FuelsGas & LNGImport SubstitutionIndustrial PolicyMarkets & FinanceMobility & EVPrices & InflationTextilesTrade & Tariffs

Each topic is a live archive page that updates itself as pieces are labelled. It replaces a hand-kept list that had fallen 18 articles behind.